I Or Pro For Video Editing Mac To A
I Or Pro For Video Editing Full Res And
I Or Pro For Video Editing Plus You Can

As several factors are involved we tested as many as possible to provide plenty of data and to give you the best information.

You must have JavaScript enabled in your browser to utilize the functionality of this website.

I Or Pro For Video Editing Mac To A

At BIZON a lot of our customers want to switch from a Mac to a PC Workstation.

As workflows have increased from 4K, 6K, and even 8K in some places, it is important to make the right choice for optimum performance.

Our previous article compared the performance of the iMac Pro and Mac Pro to a PC when using Premier Pro 2019.

However, at BIZON we decided to go one step further and test their performance when using DaVinci Resolve 14 application.

You might think that the Mac Pro and iMac Pro arent really optimized to use DaVinci Resolve 14 and youd be right.

Resolve works better with multiple GPUs and is optimized for CUDA, which is only available on NVIDIA GPUs.

I Or Pro For Video Editing Plus You Can

Apple uses AMD GPUs and only Mac Pro has more than a single card, plus you can easily get dual, triple, or quad GPU configurations with a PC.

However, the iMac Pro and Mac Pro are the best Apple has to offer, thats why we decided to check how they compare with a PC.

To make a comparison we took two high-end iMac Pros along with an old Mac Pro and tested them against three similarly priced PCs.

If you love charts youll love taking a look at the data, however, you can always skip the charts if you dont fancy the visuals.

To resolve the question as to which system is better for DaVinci Resolve 14 we used the following system configurations: 1.

BIZON V5000 10-Core Video Editing Workstation PC More details.

In order to do this we used a single 1TB PCIe SSD drive and 64GB of RAM on our BIZON PC workstations, even though wed usually recommend a little less RAM and multiple internal storage drives when using Resolve.

The iMac systems have a built-in display but you need to buy a mouse and keyboard, so we also added them to our PC workstation and the Mac Pro, along with a monitor.

In terms of cost, this adds on an extra 420 but if you opt for a PC it depends on the peripherals you decide to buy.

Our tests focused on the Color tab and on the minimum FPS when using different media and levels of grading.

The lowest level was a basic correction using the color wheels plus 4 Power Window nodes with motion tracking.

All the tests were completed at Ultra HD (3840x2160) and we changed the playback frame rate to match the medias FPS.

I Or Pro For Video Editing Full Res And

We tested CinemaDNG, ARRIRAW, and RED for the RAW footage and tested with the RAW decode quality at Full Res and Half Res.

We thought full resolution decoding would show the largest performance difference and we tested a lower decode resolution for the level of FPS increase.

The footage from our tests can be seen below and you can even click on the links to complete your own tests.

Live playback performance can be tricky to test as it depends on the codec and resolution of your media, the number of nodes used, the effects you apply and the decode resolution used for RAW footage.

Imac Or Mac Pro For Video Editing